It’s the only real disease that’s as one of its primary symptoms the belief that there isn’t it. Denial is a hallmark. So, how exactly does a person select a drug rehabilitation facility when they’re caught in the grips of the disease? What factors should be considered? Who must certanly be consulted? In reality, who should make your decision? Considering the type of the situation requiring help, they’re perplexing problems.
Examination of the type of the disease would declare that anyone suffering from addiction is least capable of making such decisions. This presents a critically important double bind that’s failed to be recognized within the standard way of treating addiction.
Consider the patient struggling for some time with addiction, if it be to alcohol, other drugs, gambling, and other compulsions. Despite experiencing increasingly prevalent negative consequences, anyone characteristically continues to drink or use.
While there may be variability amongst individuals in the total amount and frequency of indulgence, there’s always progression of the disease and its ravaging effects on mind, body and spirit over time. The alcoholic or addict continues to get feelings of relief or comfort despite a progressive erosion of everything worth addressing within their life.
The thought of doing the same thing over and over expecting a different outcome is nothing less than insanity. Personal values, family responsibilities, work performance, health, relationships, and legal stability continue steadily to erode. Yet the relentless pursuit of comfort through the familiar drink, drug, or behavior always prevails. Attempts to regulate use always fail. And denial of the situation perpetuates the cycle.
The afternoon hopefully comes in the progression of the disease whereby the patient hits what is often referred to as’their bottom ‘, and accepts that they may require help. Considering that the patient in need of help is caught in a vicious downward spiral of insanity and denial, how do anyone reasonably expect that they’d make a rational, thoughtful, well researched decision on treatment that factors in the very best interests of most concerned? We should remember that their utmost thinking got them into this state.
They basically don’t have the faintest clue of what they need. If they did, and were able to access appropriate resources for help on the way, they’d not be facing the dilemma before them. The condition has robbed them of the ability to make healthy choices for their own lives.
Furthermore, by ab muscles nature of the disease, the addict is motivated to accomplish what is comfortable and familiar. Many treatment facilities alcohol rehab ma offer therapeutic and lifestyle approaches that are foreign to most seeking help. This presents a paradox because the more the desirability of the facility offering, the not as likely it is usually to be of therapeutic value.
This conundrum is further exacerbated by recognition of addiction as a family disease. In many cases, the important thing decision makers are family members. Parents, spouses, siblings and children often seek help for their loved one.
They’ve often lived with and become a the main addictive dynamic over many years. Characteristically, family members take part in care-taking, and sometimes enabling behavior of valiantly attempting to regulate the drinking or drugging of the addict within their family.
It’s very problematic for most family unit members to just accept the truth that, just since the addict is powerless over their addiction, they, too, are powerless over the addict within their life. They are powerless to simply help their cherished one suffering from addiction. In reality, most attempts to simply help usually are section of what perpetuates the problem. Again, we are offered a troublesome catch 22.
So, if both anyone suffering from the disease, and their family members are inherently impaired within their power to objectively and rationally evaluate the qualities of treatment methods before them, who should best decide? Perhaps neither. For an addict to just accept the truth that they want help, they need to come to the realization that their lives have become unmanageable.
An alcoholic / addict accepting help is an act of surrender. Surrender is defined as “moving to the winning side “.Who’s side? The side where in fact the help is. The procedure provider.
Thus, the addiction treatment provider carries a huge ethical responsibility to ensure they give what is the most truly effective program possible in the very best interests of the clients or patients. Broken lives are turned over for their care.
It’s incumbent upon every addiction treatment provider and professional to take a hard look at their program offerings. Are the interests of the client the important thing determinant of the decision making process?
Who is best served by this system design, philosophical approach, and strategic direction of the organization? Who knows best? If neither the addict seeking help, or their family members who often hold the purse strings, then the treatment provider must make the tough calls. Programs need to supply what the addict needs, not what best serves the bottom line of the procedure organization.
Addiction treatment shouldn’t be described as a popularity contest to see who can attract probably the most patients and make the most money. The process facing treatment providers is heightened by the current recession.
Funding dollars are scarce and many beds are empty. Jobs are on the line. Short-term solutions in the very best interest of the provider might actually be detrimental to those they serve in the long run. Choosing to supply the most truly effective addiction treatment in the very best interest of the client is what best serves the addict.